Kate O’Reilly

24 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Kate O’Reilly
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Research and Theory 10
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 87
  • Speech and Hearing 16
  • General Health Professions 58
Replace Sharol F. Jacobson with:
Sharol F. Jacobson United States
Gülten Koç Türkiye
Daniel A. Nagel Canada
Louise Hoyle United Kingdom
Helen J. Lee United States
Windsor Westbrook Sherrill United States
Darson Rhodes United States
Maye Omar United Kingdom
Raimunda Medeiros Germano Brazil
Debbie Kane Canada
Kate O’Reilly relative to Sharol F. Jacobson United States Sharol F. Jacobson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23.7×
Sharol F. Jacobson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate O’Reilly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate O’Reilly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate O’Reilly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate O’Reilly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate O’Reilly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate O’Reilly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate O’Reilly. The network helps show where Kate O’Reilly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Kate O’Reilly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate O’Reilly Line = papers co-authored together Kate O’Reilly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202345
2 201834
3 201833
4 202132
5 202231
6 201827
7 200221
8 201918
9 201715
10 202215
11 202115
12 202014
13 202311
14 201910
15 20189
16 20214
17 20174
18
An exploration of the post-intensive rehabilitation care of young adults with severe acquired brain injury
20153
19 20183
20 20242

About Kate O’Reilly

Kate O’Reilly is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Education and Gender Studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (6 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (2 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (10 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (87 citations), Speech and Hearing (16 citations) and General Health Professions (58 citations). Kate O’Reilly has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Kath Peters, Nathan J. Wilson, Peter Lewis, Michele Wiese, Julie Pryor, Rakime Elmir, Lauretta Luck, Susan McInnes, Fiona McDermid and Zhen Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia, Nursing Inquiry and Rehabilitation Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact