Kate McLean

425 citations
15 papers · 223 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Kate McLean

12 papers receiving 194 citations

Peers

Kate McLean
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Sensory Systems 29
  • Geography, Planning and Development 30
  • Urban Studies 29
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 6
  • Transportation 21
Replace Jieling Xiao with:
Jieling Xiao United Kingdom
Antonella Radicchi Germany
Tianchen Dai China
Aminreza Iranmanesh Cyprus
Alexander Dunkel Germany
Filipa Matos Wunderlich United Kingdom
Jean-François Augoyard France
Mohamed Gamal Abdelmonem United Kingdom
Kevin Lynch Ireland
Marco Boffi Italy
Kate McLean relative to Jieling Xiao United Kingdom Jieling Xiao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Jieling Xiao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate McLean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate McLean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate McLean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate McLean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate McLean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate McLean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate McLean. The network helps show where Kate McLean may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Kate McLean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate McLean Line = papers co-authored together Kate McLean links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1
Smelly Maps: The Digital Life of Urban Smellscapes
201548
2 202137
3 201631
4 202025
5 202022
6 202116
7 201811
8 201510
9
Communicating and mediating smellscapes: the design and exposition of olfactory mappings
20178
10
Towards a Visual Voice for Smells
20165
11 20175
12 20173
13
A winter smellwalk in Kyiv
20171
14
Mapping the quixotic volatility of smellscapes: a trialogue - interview with Kate McLean
20181
15 20230

About Kate McLean

Kate McLean is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Geography, Planning and Development, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 15 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sound Studies and Aurality (7 papers), Public Spaces through Art (6 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (5 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (3 papers), Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis (2 papers), Smart Cities and Technologies (2 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (29 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (30 citations), Urban Studies (29 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (6 citations) and Transportation (21 citations). Kate McLean has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Luca Maria Aiello, Rossano Schifanella, Daniele Quercia, Chris Perkins, Larry E. Shiner, Francesco Aletta, Antonella Radicchi, Jieling Xiao, Sybille Lammes and S. Ehrich. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Leonardo, The American Historical Review, Manchester University Press eBooks and Landscape Architecture Frontiers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact