Kate Hopper

89 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Kate Hopper
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 140
  • Small Animals 213
  • Emergency Medicine 223
  • Nephrology 164
  • Equine 36
Replace Deborah C. Silverstein with:
Deborah C. Silverstein United States
Claire R. Sharp United States
Søren Boysen Canada
Daniel L. Chan United Kingdom
Teresa C. DeFrancesco United States
Maureen McMichael United States
Mark A. Oyama United States
Gregory F. Grauer United States
Denny J. Meyer United States
David Grimaldi France
Kate Hopper relative to Deborah C. Silverstein United States Deborah C. Silverstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Deborah C. Silverstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Hopper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Hopper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Hopper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Hopper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Hopper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Hopper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Hopper. The network helps show where Kate Hopper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Hopper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kate Hopper Line = papers co-authored together Kate Hopper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993107
2 201293
3 200283
4 200778
5 201070
6 200266
7 200565
8 199059
9 201359
10 200553
11 201440
12 200539
13 201032
14 201332
15 201432
16 201231
17 200827
18 202127
19 201923
20 201622

About Kate Hopper

Kate Hopper is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Nephrology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (22 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (17 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (16 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (6 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (6 papers), Electrolyte and hormonal disorders (6 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers) and Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (140 citations), Small Animals (213 citations), Emergency Medicine (223 citations), Nephrology (164 citations) and Equine (36 citations). Kate Hopper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Steve C. Haskins, Steven Epstein, Janet Aldrich, Marlis L. Rezende, Matthew S. Mellema, Lisa L. Powell, Bruce McCord, Philip H. Kass, Shane Bateman and Manuel Boller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association and Frontiers in Veterinary Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact