Kate Hey
Impact in
-
- Smoking Behavior and Cessation
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Papers in
-
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy 5
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics 4
- Surgery 4
- Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments 2
- Esophageal and GI Pathology 2
- Co-authors
- Michael Murphy (8 shared papers)Elaine Johnstone (5 shared papers)Robert Walton (4 shared papers)Sarah J. Roberts (3 shared papers)P Yudkin (2 shared papers)Sarah Welch (1 shared paper)Paul Aveyard (2 shared papers)Kar Keung Cheng (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biosocial Science (3 papers)Addiction Biology (3 papers)Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal (2 papers)Twin Research and Human Genetics (2 papers)British Journal of Cancer (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomQatarUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kate Hey
18 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Physiology 145
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 105
- Applied Psychology 18
- Urology 17
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 46
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Hey
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Hey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Hey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Hey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Hey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Hey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Hey. The network helps show where Kate Hey may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kate Hey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 116 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 80 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 55 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 27 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3 |
About Kate Hey
Kate Hey is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Epidemiology, Physiology and Demography, having authored 18 papers that have together received 440 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (5 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (145 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (105 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations), Urology (17 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (46 citations). Kate Hey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Murphy, Elaine Johnstone, Robert Walton, Sarah J. Roberts, P Yudkin, Sarah Welch, Paul Aveyard, Kar Keung Cheng, Peymané Adab and D. Michael A. Wallace. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biosocial Science, Addiction Biology, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal, Twin Research and Human Genetics and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.