Kate Gregory
Impact in
- Nephrology top 2%
- Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
- Livestock Management and Performance Improvement
Papers in
-
- Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid 5
- Surgery 1
- Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries 1
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 1
- Co-authors
- L. A. Swiger (1 shared paper)W. R. Harvey (1 shared paper)Fiona McQueen (5 shared papers)Nicola Dalbeth (5 shared papers)Barnaby Clark (4 shared papers)Anthony Doyle (2 shared papers)G. Gamble (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Robinson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biometrics (1 paper)Lara D. Veeken (1 paper)Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (1 paper)Journal of Spine Surgery (1 paper)Arthritis Care & Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Kate Gregory
6 papers receiving 574 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Nephrology 308
- Agronomy and Crop Science 141
- Animal Science and Zoology 86
- Rheumatology 114
- Genetics 182
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Gregory
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Gregory's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Gregory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Gregory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Gregory
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Gregory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Gregory. The network helps show where Kate Gregory may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Kate Gregory, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1964 | 287 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 152 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 100 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 52 | |
| 5 | The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index is a valid measure of physical function in gout. | 2009 | 27 |
| 6 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 0 |
About Kate Gregory
Kate Gregory is a scholar working on Nephrology, Surgery, Small Animals, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 7 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (5 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper), Banana Cultivation and Research (1 paper), Veterinary medicine and infectious diseases (1 paper), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (1 paper), Inflammasome and immune disorders (1 paper), Genetics and Plant Breeding (1 paper) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (308 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (141 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (86 citations), Rheumatology (114 citations) and Genetics (182 citations). Kate Gregory has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include L. A. Swiger, W. R. Harvey, Fiona McQueen, Nicola Dalbeth, Barnaby Clark, Anthony Doyle, G. Gamble, Elizabeth Robinson, Gregory D. Gamble and William J. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Biometrics, Lara D. Veeken, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Journal of Spine Surgery and Arthritis Care & Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.