Karen E. Moe

1.8k citations
35 papers · 1.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Karen E. Moe

35 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Karen E. Moe
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 322
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 595
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 94
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 407
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 293
Replace Philippe Hubain with:
Philippe Hubain Belgium
Päivi Polo-Kantola Finland
DONAL C. PARKER United States
Boris Perras Germany
LAWRENCE G. ROSSMAN United States
Angelo Bertani Italy
Christopher Nogeire United States
Y. Dagan Israel
G. Saletu‐Zyhlarz Austria
Francesco Catapano Italy
Karen E. Moe relative to Philippe Hubain Belgium Philippe Hubain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Philippe Hubain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Karen E. Moe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karen E. Moe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karen E. Moe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karen E. Moe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karen E. Moe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karen E. Moe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karen E. Moe. The network helps show where Karen E. Moe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Karen E. Moe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Karen E. Moe Line = papers co-authored together Karen E. Moe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004272
2 2002147
3 1995137
4 199966
5 198661
6 199159
7 200456
8 198654
9 199754
10 198649
11 199946
12 198843
13 200139
14 200139
15 199637
16 199532
17 199528
18 199924
19 199823
20 199421

About Karen E. Moe

Karen E. Moe is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (7 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (6 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (6 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (4 papers) and Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (322 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (595 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (94 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (407 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (293 citations). Karen E. Moe has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Michael V. Vitiello, Lawrence H. Larsen, Patricia N. Prinz, Alan N. Epstein, G. R. Merriam, Mark L. Weiss, A. N. Epstein, Charles W. Wilkinson, Robert S. Schwartz and James M. Scanlan. Their work appears in journals such as The Journals of Gerontology Series A, SLEEP, Journal of Sleep Research, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact