Kaiyang Ding

1.2k citations
52 papers · 725 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Kaiyang Ding

49 papers receiving 706 citations

Peers

Kaiyang Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Hematology 204
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 167
  • Genetics 64
  • Oncology 121
  • Molecular Biology 129
Replace Jee Hyun Kong with:
Jee Hyun Kong South Korea
Vishala T. Neppalli United States
Jia‐Zhu Wu China
Theo Daniel Kim Germany
Masayuki Kurata Japan
Klaus Maria Josten Germany
Herlander Marques Portugal
Plamen M. Kossev United States
Elber S. Camacho United States
Troy Bainbridge United States
Kaiyang Ding relative to Jee Hyun Kong South Korea Jee Hyun Kong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Jee Hyun Kong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kaiyang Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kaiyang Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kaiyang Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kaiyang Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kaiyang Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kaiyang Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kaiyang Ding. The network helps show where Kaiyang Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kaiyang Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kaiyang Ding Line = papers co-authored together Kaiyang Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017203
2 202338
3 202337
4 202333
5 201130
6 202130
7 200929
8 202325
9 202022
10 202320
11 202118
12 202217
13 202417
14 201216
15 201416
16 202216
17 201812
18 202212
19 202311
20 201910

About Kaiyang Ding

Kaiyang Ding is a scholar working on Hematology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 52 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (18 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (9 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (6 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (5 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (5 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (3 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (2 papers) and Hemophilia Treatment and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (204 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (167 citations), Genetics (64 citations), Oncology (121 citations) and Molecular Biology (129 citations). Kaiyang Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Xiaoyan Wang, Zhou Yuan, Zimin Sun, Xin Liu, Juan Tong, Xu Zhang, Weiliang Zhu, Jian Wu, Xingguang Liu and Huanhuan Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Frontiers in Oncology, Annals of Hematology, American Journal of Hematology and Hematological Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact