Kai Kumpf

8 papers receiving 155 citations

Peers

Kai Kumpf
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 31
  • Information Systems and Management 17
  • General Psychology 2
  • Health Informatics 2
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 7
Replace Fong-Lin Jang with:
Fong-Lin Jang Taiwan
Haruhiko Takeuchi Japan
Bénédicte Batrancourt France
Bela Usabaev Germany
Alexander Bowring United Kingdom
Stephan Heunis Netherlands
Reza Adalat Canada
Margaret King United States
Dylan Wood United States
Graham Walker United Kingdom
Kai Kumpf relative to Fong-Lin Jang Taiwan Fong-Lin Jang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Fong-Lin Jang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kai Kumpf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kai Kumpf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kai Kumpf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kai Kumpf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kai Kumpf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kai Kumpf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kai Kumpf. The network helps show where Kai Kumpf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kai Kumpf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kai Kumpf Line = papers co-authored together Kai Kumpf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 199749
2 199748
3 200816
4 200715
5 200514
6
The @neurIST ontology of intracranial aneurysms: providing terminological services for an integrated IT infrastructure.
200713
7 20086
8
Design of an Ontology on Cerebral Aneurysms: Representing the Conceptual Space of the @neurIST Project
20072

About Kai Kumpf

Kai Kumpf is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Information Systems and Management, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 8 papers that have together received 163 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (4 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (3 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (2 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (2 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), linguistics and terminology studies (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (31 citations), Information Systems and Management (17 citations), General Psychology (2 citations), Health Informatics (2 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (7 citations). Kai Kumpf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ingmar Gutberlet, Günter Schiepek, Zbigniew J. Kowalik, Wolfgang H. R. Miltner, Jens Ehrhardt, Thomas Elbert, Larry E. Roberts, Thomas Weiß, Martin Hofmann‐Apitius and Siegfried Benkner. Their work appears in journals such as Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, Psychotherapy Research, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience, Neuroscience Letters and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact