Kai Bachmann

36 papers receiving 718 citations

Peers

Kai Bachmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 88
  • Water Science and Technology 191
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 112
  • Mechanical Engineering 418
  • Geophysics 124
Replace Ying Gu with:
Ying Gu China
Rolf Fandrich Australia
Hongjiang Wang China
Jukka Kuva Finland
Kurt Moeller Germany
S. P. Suthers Australia
Sabine Gilbricht Germany
Koosha Kalhor Iran
Jian Xiong China
Kai Bachmann relative to Ying Gu China Ying Gu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Ying Gu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kai Bachmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kai Bachmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kai Bachmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kai Bachmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kai Bachmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kai Bachmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kai Bachmann. The network helps show where Kai Bachmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kai Bachmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kai Bachmann Line = papers co-authored together Kai Bachmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015102
2 202273
3 202155
4 201849
5 201648
6 201645
7 201843
8 201737
9 201335
10 201534
11 201931
12 201515
13 201915
14 201515
15 201914
16 201812
17 201811
18 202211
19 20239
20 20029

About Kai Bachmann

Kai Bachmann is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, Water Science and Technology and Geophysics, having authored 38 papers that have together received 726 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mineral Processing and Grinding (22 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (13 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (13 papers), Metal Extraction and Bioleaching (12 papers), Extraction and Separation Processes (7 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (6 papers), Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (4 papers) and Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geochemistry and Petrology (88 citations), Water Science and Technology (191 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (112 citations), Mechanical Engineering (418 citations) and Geophysics (124 citations). Kai Bachmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Portugal and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Jens Gutzmer, Urs A. Peuker, Thomas Leißner, Martin Rudolph, Raimon Tolosana‐Delgado, Luca Caracciolo, Hilmar von Eynatten, Volker Karius, Joachim Krause and Max Frenzel. Their work appears in journals such as Minerals Engineering, Microscopy and Microanalysis, Mineralium Deposita, International Journal of Mineral Processing and Journal of Geochemical Exploration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact