K. Kos

495 citations
46 papers · 360 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

K. Kos

43 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

K. Kos
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Insect Science 233
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 194
  • Plant Science 125
  • Ecology 75
  • Endocrinology 15
Replace Tessa R. Grasswitz with:
Tessa R. Grasswitz United States
N.A. Martin New Zealand
Agostino Strangi Italy
R. Sobhian France
Tuomo Tuovinen Finland
Anand B. Persad United States
Maureen E. Carter United States
Н. Н. Карпун Russia
Richard Hilton United States
Marie‐Hélène Sauge France
K. Kos relative to Tessa R. Grasswitz United States Tessa R. Grasswitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Tessa R. Grasswitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. Kos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Kos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Kos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Kos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Kos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Kos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Kos. The network helps show where K. Kos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. Kos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. Kos Line = papers co-authored together K. Kos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201630
2 201530
3 201130
4 202124
5 201223
6 201722
7 198121
8 202020
9 201216
10 201216
11 200813
12 202010
13 20147
14 20107
15
3つのアブラムシ寄生バチ種の分子的変異と翼形態の変異の間の関連:Aphidius uzbekistanicus Luzhetzki,Aphidius rhopalosiphi De Stefani PerezおよびAphidius avenaphis(Fitch)(膜翅類:コマユバチ科:Aphidiinae)
20136
16
Review of interactions between host plants, aphids, primary parasitoids and hyperparasitoids in vegetable and cereal ecosystems in Slovenia.
20126
17 20086
18 20096
19 20096
20 20186

About K. Kos

K. Kos is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (27 papers), Plant and animal studies (13 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (12 papers), Insect Pest Control Strategies (8 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (7 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (7 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers) and Insect Utilization and Effects (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (233 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (194 citations), Plant Science (125 citations), Ecology (75 citations) and Endocrinology (15 citations). K. Kos has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia, Serbia and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Stanislav Trdan, Željko Tomanović, George Melika, Andjeljko Petrović, Nickolas G. Kavallieratos, Breda Jakovac-Strajn, Petr Starý, Gabrijela Tavčar-Kalcher, Janja Babič and Jernej Jakše. Their work appears in journals such as Pest Management Science, Journal of Applied Entomology, Zoologischer Anzeiger, Toxins and Annals of the Entomological Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact