K. D. Cocker

475 citations
11 papers · 306 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

K. D. Cocker

11 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

K. D. Cocker
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Ophthalmology 152
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 181
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 76
  • Epidemiology 120
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 57
Replace Lucinda Teoh with:
Lucinda Teoh United Kingdom
John T. Flynn United States
Irene Altemir Spain
Fernando Molle Italy
Shayne Brown Australia
Gun Kvarnström Sweden
Denise J. Pearson United States
P. E. Arnold United Kingdom
Taylan Öztürk Türkiye
Abinaya Priya Venkataraman Sweden
K. D. Cocker relative to Lucinda Teoh United Kingdom Lucinda Teoh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Lucinda Teoh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by K. D. Cocker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. D. Cocker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. D. Cocker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. D. Cocker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. D. Cocker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. D. Cocker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. D. Cocker. The network helps show where K. D. Cocker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside K. D. Cocker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with K. D. Cocker Line = papers co-authored together K. D. Cocker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 199592
2 200669
3 200868
4 200418
5 201116
6
Automatic extraction of the structure of the retinal blood vessel network of premature infants.
200713
7
Visual acuity and pupillary responses to spatial structure in infants.
199411
8 20168
9 19967
10 20053
11
Vessel Parameters of the Developing Preterm Retina
20081

About K. D. Cocker

K. D. Cocker is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (8 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (1 paper) and Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (152 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (181 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (76 citations), Epidemiology (120 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (57 citations). K. D. Cocker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Alistair R. Fielder, M J Moseley, H S Jones, Michael R. Irwin, Merrick J. Moseley, Graham E. Quinn, Monte D. Mills, A R Fielder, Anna L. Ells and Clare Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Ophthalmology, Eye, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus and The Imaging Science Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact