Julius Reimer

572 citations
19 papers · 388 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Media Studies and Communication
    • Social Media and Politics
    • Public Relations and Crisis Communication
    • Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
    • Gender, Feminism, and Media

Papers in

Julius Reimer

16 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers

Julius Reimer
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Communication 300
  • Gender Studies 29
  • Sociology and Political Science 139
  • Literature and Literary Theory 30
  • General Social Sciences 4
Replace Ori Tenenboim with:
Ori Tenenboim United States
Anthony Nadler United States
Kate Milberry Canada
Juliette De Maeyer Canada
Fred Fletcher Canada
Rebecca Coates Nee United States
María-Cruz Negreira-Rey Spain
J. David Wolfgang United States
Katherine Fink United States
Marina Vujnović United States
Julius Reimer relative to Ori Tenenboim United States Ori Tenenboim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Ori Tenenboim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julius Reimer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julius Reimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julius Reimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julius Reimer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julius Reimer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julius Reimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julius Reimer. The network helps show where Julius Reimer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Julius Reimer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julius Reimer Line = papers co-authored together Julius Reimer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201784
2 201382
3 202067
4 201155
5 202036
6 201721
7 202120
8 20205
9 20134
10 20224
11 20133
12 20152
13 20231
14 20121
15 20251
16 20131
17
Transparenz und Vertrauen : ist transparenter Journalismus tatsächlich glaubwürdiger?
20101
18 20130
19 20170

About Julius Reimer

Julius Reimer is a scholar working on Communication, Management of Technology and Innovation, Artificial Intelligence, Gender Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 19 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (11 papers), Social Media and Politics (9 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (4 papers), Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media (2 papers), Digital Innovation in Industries (2 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (2 papers), Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (2 papers) and Public Administration and Political Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (300 citations), Gender Studies (29 citations), Sociology and Political Science (139 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (30 citations) and General Social Sciences (4 citations). Julius Reimer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Finland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Wiebke Loosen, Klaus Meier, Sascha Hölig, Jan Schmidt, Walid Maalej, L. Merten, Laura Ahva, Mark Deuze, Zijad Kurtanović and Verena Albert. Their work appears in journals such as Journalism, Journalism Studies, Digital Journalism, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly and Studies in Communication and Media.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact