Juliet Wright

45 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Juliet Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 155
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 39
  • Ophthalmology 184
  • Toxicology 59
  • Research and Theory 8
Replace Maaike Langelaan with:
Maaike Langelaan Netherlands
Carolyn Czoski‐Murray United Kingdom
Alessandro Bonsignore Italy
Laura T. Pizzi United States
Heather A. Jaynes United States
George Braitberg Australia
Debi Bhattacharya United Kingdom
Brian J. Browne United States
M. Caroline Burton United States
J Cooper United Kingdom
Juliet Wright relative to Maaike Langelaan Netherlands Maaike Langelaan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×19.5×
Maaike Langelaan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Juliet Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Juliet Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juliet Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juliet Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Juliet Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juliet Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juliet Wright. The network helps show where Juliet Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Juliet Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Juliet Wright Line = papers co-authored together Juliet Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1968221
2 201489
3 202075
4 201672
5 201663
6 201651
7 202049
8 201246
9 201042
10 202137
11 201634
12 202228
13 202125
14 202024
15 201724
16 201823
17 201223
18 202020
19 196316
20 202014

About Juliet Wright

Juliet Wright is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Emergency Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Physiology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers), HIV-related health complications and treatments (7 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (3 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (155 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (39 citations), Ophthalmology (184 citations), Toxicology (59 citations) and Research and Theory (8 citations). Juliet Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include James L. Kennerley Bankes, E. S. Perkins, Richard Simcock, Graham Davies, Chakravarthi Rajkumar, Balamurugan Tangiisuran, Tom Levett, Stephanie Daley, Sube Banerjee and Martin Fisher. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, Age and Ageing, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Diabetic Medicine and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact