Julien Narboux

24 papers receiving 149 citations

Peers

Julien Narboux
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Theoretical Computer Science 51
  • Geometry and Topology 66
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 74
  • Software 15
  • Artificial Intelligence 102
Replace Wanda Szmielew with:
Wanda Szmielew Germany
Petr Vojtěchovský United States
Aleš Drápal Czechia
Patrick Cégielski France
L. Thiel Canada
Jaap van Oosten Netherlands
Lenny Fukshansky United States
V. Stoltenberg-Hansen Sweden
Laurent Théry France
Walter Deuber Germany
Julien Narboux relative to Wanda Szmielew Germany Wanda Szmielew's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Wanda Szmielew · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julien Narboux

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julien Narboux's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julien Narboux with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julien Narboux more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julien Narboux

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julien Narboux. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julien Narboux. The network helps show where Julien Narboux may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Julien Narboux, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julien Narboux Line = papers co-authored together Julien Narboux links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201026
2 200722
3 201812
4 201911
5 201610
6 201510
7 20179
8 20128
9 20088
10
From Hilbert to Tarski
20165
11 20095
12 20164
13 20183
14 20113
15 20243
16 20223
17
Parallel postulates and decidability of intersection of lines: a mechanized study within Tarski's system of geometry
20152
18
GeoProof: A user interface for formal proofs in geometry
20072
19
Herbrand's Theorem and Non-Euclidean Geometry
20151
20 20231

About Julien Narboux

Julien Narboux is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Theoretical Computer Science, Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Software, having authored 27 papers that have together received 153 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (20 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (13 papers), Mathematics and Applications (12 papers), Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing (8 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (5 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (4 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (3 papers) and Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (51 citations), Geometry and Topology (66 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (74 citations), Software (15 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (102 citations). Julien Narboux has collaborated with scholars based in France, Serbia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Predrag Janičić, Pascal Schreck, Christian Urban, Michael Beeson, Freek Wiedijk, David Braun and Cristel Pelsser. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Automated Reasoning, Computational Geometry, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science and Journal of Symbolic Computation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact