Júlia Stoll
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 1%
- Obesity and Health Practices
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 4
- Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health 1
- Pharmacy 3
- Obesity and Health Practices 3
- Co-authors
- Manuel Trachsel (8 shared papers)Amy L. Ahern (2 shared papers)Adrian Mander (2 shared papers)Christina Holzapfel (3 shared papers)Hans Hauner (3 shared papers)Susan A. Jebb (2 shared papers)Ian D. Caterson (2 shared papers)Suzanne Pearson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Psychiatry (5 papers)BMC Psychiatry (2 papers)International Journal of Obesity (1 paper)The Lancet (1 paper)DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyAustralia
In The Last Decade
Júlia Stoll
11 papers receiving 593 citations
Júlia Stoll's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Pharmacy 138
- Applied Psychology 114
- Clinical Psychology 154
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 169
- Physiology 73
Countries citing papers authored by Júlia Stoll
This map shows the geographic impact of Júlia Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Júlia Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Júlia Stoll more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Júlia Stoll
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Júlia Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Júlia Stoll. The network helps show where Júlia Stoll may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Júlia Stoll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Primary care referral to a commercial provider for weight loss treatment versus standard care: a randomised controlled trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 325 |
| 2 | 2020 | 198 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 1 |
About Júlia Stoll
Júlia Stoll is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy, Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (1 paper), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (1 paper), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (138 citations), Applied Psychology (114 citations), Clinical Psychology (154 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (169 citations) and Physiology (73 citations). Júlia Stoll has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Manuel Trachsel, Amy L. Ahern, Adrian Mander, Christina Holzapfel, Hans Hauner, Susan A. Jebb, Ian D. Caterson, Suzanne Pearson, Ashley Olson and Ulrike Amann‐Gassner. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, BMC Psychiatry, International Journal of Obesity, The Lancet and DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.