Julia Searle

1.5k citations
49 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Searle

48 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Julia Searle
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Emergency Medicine 406
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 440
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 39
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 151
  • General Health Professions 157
Replace Feng Qiu with:
Feng Qiu Canada
Gerald Ogola United States
Greg D. Sacks United States
Rossana De Palma Italy
Snehal R. Patel United States
Shuang Li United States
Nosheen Reza United States
Alan Finlayson United Kingdom
Luca Baldetti Italy
Chris Wilkinson United Kingdom
Julia Searle relative to Feng Qiu Canada Feng Qiu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Feng Qiu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Searle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Searle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Searle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Searle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Searle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Searle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Searle. The network helps show where Julia Searle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Searle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Searle Line = papers co-authored together Julia Searle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012186
2 2014154
3 201677
4 201146
5 201541
6 201540
7 201937
8 201636
9 201431
10 201528
11 201326
12 201725
13 201723
14 201621
15
Biomarkers in acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention.
201119
16 201519
17 201519
18 201518
19 201416
20 201815

About Julia Searle

Julia Searle is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery and Clinical Psychology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (15 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (15 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (11 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (7 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (5 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (4 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (406 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (440 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (39 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (151 citations) and General Health Professions (157 citations). Julia Searle has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin Möckel, Anna Slagman, Reinhold Müller, Christian Müller, Johann Frick, Martina Schmiedhofer, Rajan Somasundaram, Tobias Lindner, J. Vollert and Evangelos Giannitsis. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, European Journal of Emergency Medicine, Biomarkers, International Journal of Cardiology and ESC Heart Failure.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact