Julia Scholly

26 papers receiving 634 citations

Peers

Julia Scholly
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 418
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 174
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 170
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 121
  • Neurology 67
Replace Vlastimil Šulc with:
Vlastimil Šulc Czechia
A. Ebner Germany
Nicole Poulin Canada
A. LeBron Paige United States
Vijay M. Thadani United States
Ravnoor Gill Canada
Jorge González-Martínez United States
Agathe Laurent France
Maryse A. van ’t Klooster Netherlands
Rebecca S. N. Liu United Kingdom
Julia Scholly relative to Vlastimil Šulc Czechia Vlastimil Šulc's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Vlastimil Šulc · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Scholly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Scholly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Scholly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Scholly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Scholly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Scholly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Scholly. The network helps show where Julia Scholly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Scholly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Scholly Line = papers co-authored together Julia Scholly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201868
2 201766
3 201264
4 201756
5 201452
6 202038
7 201335
8 201731
9 202130
10 202027
11 201524
12 201119
13 201719
14 201818
15 201916
16 201315
17 201913
18 202111
19 20148
20 20217

About Julia Scholly

Julia Scholly is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Neurology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (20 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (6 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Hallucinations in medical conditions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (418 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (174 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (170 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (121 citations) and Neurology (67 citations). Julia Scholly has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anke M. Staack, Fabrice Bartoloméi, Bernhard J. Steinhoff, Édouard Hirsch, Didier Scavarda, Louise Tyvaert, Delphine Taussig, P. Kehrli, Lorella Minotti and Alexandra Montavont. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Epileptic Disorders, Epilepsy Research, Seizure and PLoS Computational Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact