Julia Resch

742 citations
23 papers · 465 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Resch

23 papers receiving 454 citations

Peers

Julia Resch
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 146
  • Cancer Research 97
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 18
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 20
  • Oncology 64
Replace Depicha Jindatip with:
Depicha Jindatip Thailand
Zihao Zhou China
Liang Wu China
Lilian Puebla Spain
Yulin Ma China
Hema Kalyanaraman United States
Xinhong Wang China
Chang‐Ning Hao China
Julia Resch relative to Depicha Jindatip Thailand Depicha Jindatip's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Depicha Jindatip · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Resch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Resch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Resch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Resch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Resch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Resch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Resch. The network helps show where Julia Resch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Resch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Resch Line = papers co-authored together Julia Resch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200987
2 200584
3 201153
4 201151
5 201627
6 201119
7 202216
8 202016
9 202013
10 202012
11 202112
12 202311
13 202110
14 201610
15 20229
16 20238
17 20207
18 20196
19 20214
20 20243

About Julia Resch

Julia Resch is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Oncology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (5 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (5 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (3 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (3 papers), Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (2 papers), Optimization and Search Problems (2 papers) and Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (146 citations), Cancer Research (97 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (18 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (20 citations) and Oncology (64 citations). Julia Resch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Georg Brabant, Kaye J. Williams, Natalie Burrows, N Kremenevskaja, Muhammad Babur, Catharine West, Cuong Hoang‐Vu, Reinhard von Wasielewski, R. Cowen and Jens Mittag. Their work appears in journals such as Thyroid, Polymers, Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, Journal of Scheduling and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact