Julia Onken
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Peter Vajkoczy (51 shared papers)Martin Misch (18 shared papers)Marcus Czabanka (10 shared papers)Josefine Radke (10 shared papers)David Kaul (16 shared papers)Frank L. Heppner (6 shared papers)Simon Bayerl (5 shared papers)Tobias Finger (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Neuro-Oncology (9 papers)Acta Neurochirurgica (5 papers)Neuro-Oncology (5 papers)Frontiers in Oncology (4 papers)Journal of Neurosurgery Spine (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandAustria
In The Last Decade
Julia Onken
68 papers receiving 962 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Genetics 287
- Neurology 139
- Cancer Research 75
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 145
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 76
Countries citing papers authored by Julia Onken
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Onken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Onken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Onken more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Onken
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Onken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Onken. The network helps show where Julia Onken may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Onken, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 52 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 39 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 38 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 21 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 20 |
About Julia Onken
Julia Onken is a scholar working on Genetics, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 969 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (26 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (9 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (6 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (5 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (287 citations), Neurology (139 citations), Cancer Research (75 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (145 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (76 citations). Julia Onken has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Peter Vajkoczy, Martin Misch, Marcus Czabanka, Josefine Radke, David Kaul, Frank L. Heppner, Simon Bayerl, Tobias Finger, David Capper and Thomas Picht. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuro-Oncology, Acta Neurochirurgica, Neuro-Oncology, Frontiers in Oncology and Journal of Neurosurgery Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.