Julia Moser

2.1k citations
64 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Moser

62 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Julia Moser
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 548
  • Immunology and Allergy 48
  • Dermatology 70
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 115
  • Pharmacy 17
Replace Nadeem Hussain with:
Nadeem Hussain United States
Marita Broadstock United Kingdom
Patrizia Piotti Italy
Jonathon Gray United Kingdom
Fiona Cowie United Kingdom
Carlos S. Alvarado United States
Reinhard Eher Germany
Manuel Tuñón de Lara France
Miguel Martorell Spain
M.D. Mann United States
Julia Moser relative to Nadeem Hussain United States Nadeem Hussain's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17.1×
Nadeem Hussain · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Moser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Moser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Moser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Moser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Moser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Moser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Moser. The network helps show where Julia Moser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Moser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Moser Line = papers co-authored together Julia Moser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015213
2 200878
3 201057
4 201852
5 201645
6 202337
7 201635
8
Transformations of the Welfare State: Small States, Big Lessons
201035
9 201629
10 202128
11 202127
12 201726
13 201924
14 201723
15 201722
16 202021
17 201520
18 202319
19 201819
20 201518

About Julia Moser

Julia Moser is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Social Psychology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (16 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (10 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (7 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (7 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (548 citations), Immunology and Allergy (48 citations), Dermatology (70 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (115 citations) and Pharmacy (17 citations). Julia Moser has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephan Willems, Boris Hoffmann, Doreen Schreiber, Benjamin Schäffer, Daniel Steven, Arian Sultan, Jakob Lüker, Mario Jularic, Ruken Ö. Akbulak and Christian Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Clinical Research in Cardiology, EP Europace, PLoS ONE and Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact