Clinical Research in Cardiology

2.3k papers and 43.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Clinical Research in Cardiology in the last decades have received a total of 43.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Research in Cardiology usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.8k papers), Surgery (596 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (400 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (379 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (374 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (350 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Research in Cardiology are Michael Böhm, Hugo A. Katus, Bo Li, Jing Yang, Lin Liu, Faming Zhao, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Yunhe Zhao, Xiqian Wang and Lili Zhi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Research in Cardiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Research in Cardiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Research in Cardiology.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Research in Cardiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Research in Cardiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Research in Cardiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Research in Cardiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025