Julia M. Probert

8 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Julia M. Probert
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 180
  • Developmental Neuroscience 66
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 41
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 78
  • Neurology 50
Replace Carlos E. Trombetta with:
Carlos E. Trombetta United States
Chetan Lokhande United States
Puja Shankar United States
Xiaoyun Shi China
Julie A. Wyrobek United States
Helena Claesson Lingehall Sweden
Foquan Luo China
Julin Tang United States
Partha J Saha United States
Ungkab Prakanrattana Thailand
Julia M. Probert relative to Carlos E. Trombetta United States Carlos E. Trombetta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Carlos E. Trombetta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia M. Probert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia M. Probert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia M. Probert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia M. Probert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia M. Probert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia M. Probert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia M. Probert. The network helps show where Julia M. Probert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia M. Probert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia M. Probert Line = papers co-authored together Julia M. Probert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2018140
2 2019137
3 202225
4 202112
5 201912
6 20175
7 20222
8 20251
9 20140
10 20220

About Julia M. Probert

Julia M. Probert is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Neurology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (6 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (1 paper), Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (1 paper) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (180 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (66 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (41 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (78 citations) and Neurology (50 citations). Julia M. Probert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jing Tian, Kaushik Mandal, Charles H. Brown, Charles W. Jr Hogue, Karin J. Neufeld, Atsushi Yamaguchi, Yohei Nomura, Kenton J. Zehr, Vidyulata J. Kamath and Michelle Burke Parish. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, JAMA Surgery, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and Psychosomatics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact