Julia Dehm

448 citations
34 papers · 227 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Dehm

28 papers receiving 186 citations

Peers

Julia Dehm
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Law 77
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 46
  • Global and Planetary Change 37
  • Political Science and International Relations 48
  • Sociology and Political Science 55
Replace Sam Adelman with:
Sam Adelman United Kingdom
Silja Klepp Germany
Peter Burdon Australia
Richard P. Hiskes United States
Hans-Otto Sano Denmark
Marcel L.J. Wissenburg Netherlands
Marie‐Claude Smouts France
Fred P. Bosselman United States
Bruce Rich
Cinnamon Piñon Carlarne United States
Julia Dehm relative to Sam Adelman United Kingdom Sam Adelman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sam Adelman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Dehm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Dehm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Dehm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Dehm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Dehm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Dehm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Dehm. The network helps show where Julia Dehm may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Julia Dehm, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Dehm Line = papers co-authored together Julia Dehm links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201626
2 196924
3 202321
4 202018
5
Climate Justice Inside and Outside the UNFCCC: The Example of Redd
201014
6 201914
7 201914
8 201811
9 202110
10 202110
11 20219
12 20218
13 20238
14 20187
15 20174
16 20204
17 20224
18 20234
19
Reconsidering REDD+: Authority, Power and Law in the Green Economy
20213
20 20162

About Julia Dehm

Julia Dehm is a scholar working on Law, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 34 papers that have together received 227 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental law and policy (14 papers), International Environmental Law and Policies (12 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 papers), Human Rights and Development (4 papers), Legal Rights and Human Rights (3 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (3 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (2 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (77 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (46 citations), Global and Planetary Change (37 citations), Political Science and International Relations (48 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (55 citations). Julia Dehm has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Macpherson, Jérémie Gilbert, Emily Jones, Karen Engle, Daniel M. Brinks, Matthew C. Canfield, Jillian Garvey, Brooke Wilmsen, Keir Magalie Strickland and Jessica Whyte. Their work appears in journals such as Leiden Journal of International Law, Environmental Education Research, Netherlands yearbook of international law, European Journal of International Law and Business and Human Rights Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact