Julia Buxton

1.0k citations
45 papers · 351 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Buxton

39 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Julia Buxton
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Political Science and International Relations 143
  • Development 18
  • Sociology and Political Science 202
  • Linguistics and Language 16
  • Information Systems 49
Replace Colin P. Clarke with:
Colin P. Clarke United States
Aryeh Neier United States
Romain Noël Luxembourg
Ignácio Ramonet France
Jenifer Whitten‐Woodring United States
Vicente Paqueo United States
N. Narváez-Berthelemot Mexico
William Ruger United States
Cláudio Gonçalves Couto Brazil
Alessandro Pellegata Italy
Julia Buxton relative to Colin P. Clarke United States Colin P. Clarke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Colin P. Clarke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Buxton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Buxton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Buxton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Buxton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Buxton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Buxton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Buxton. The network helps show where Julia Buxton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Julia Buxton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Buxton Line = papers co-authored together Julia Buxton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The rise and challenge of dark net drug markets.
201560
2 200634
3 199525
4 200520
5 200920
6
Drugs and Development: The Great Disconnect
201519
7 199618
8 199916
9 200815
10 201811
11 201110
12 20118
13 20198
14 20207
15 20176
16
Reintegration and Long-Term Development: Linkages and Challenges. Thematic Working Paper 5.
20085
17 20115
18 20185
19 20095
20
Conflict Prevention, Management and Reduction in Africa
20065

About Julia Buxton

Julia Buxton is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Linguistics and Language, Epidemiology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Society in Latin America (16 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (13 papers), Cultural and political discourse analysis (9 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (5 papers), Political Theory and Democracy (5 papers), International Relations in Latin America (5 papers), History and Politics in Latin America (4 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (143 citations), Development (18 citations), Sociology and Political Science (202 citations), Linguistics and Language (16 citations) and Information Systems (49 citations). Julia Buxton has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tim Bingham, Nicola Phillips, Anthony Seldon and Owen Greene. Their work appears in journals such as Democratization, Revista de ciencia política, European Journal of Criminology, International Peacekeeping and Third World Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact