Julia Busch

486 citations
19 papers · 371 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Busch

18 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Julia Busch
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 277
  • Biophysics 50
  • Spectroscopy 126
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 81
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 89
Replace Lukas Wissmann with:
Lukas Wissmann Switzerland
Peter Ullmann Germany
Nicholas R. Zwart United States
Alessandro Sbrizzi Netherlands
Ray F. Lee United States
Pablo Irarrázabal United States
George R. Duensing United States
Julia Velikina United States
Tobias Wech Germany
J.P. Groen Netherlands
Julia Busch relative to Lukas Wissmann Switzerland Lukas Wissmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Lukas Wissmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Busch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Busch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Busch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Busch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Busch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Busch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Busch. The network helps show where Julia Busch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julia Busch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Busch Line = papers co-authored together Julia Busch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201563
2 201244
3 201742
4 201441
5 201629
6 201528
7 201426
8 201522
9 201618
10 201815
11 201314
12 201810
13 20229
14 20134
15 20072
16 20122
17
Bilanzanalyse und Bilanzpolitik nach BilMoG : Einzelabschluss, Konzernabschluss und Steuerbilanz
20101
18
An experimental study of influences on the escape of perfusate during perfusion for cancer
19611
19 19780

About Julia Busch

Julia Busch is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Spectroscopy, Biophysics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (7 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (5 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (2 papers) and European Monetary and Fiscal Policies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (277 citations), Biophysics (50 citations), Spectroscopy (126 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (81 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (89 citations). Julia Busch has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sebastian Kozerke, Daniel Giese, Lukas Wissmann, Klaas P. Pruessmann, Christoph Barmet, S. Johanna Vannesjo, Marcin Krajewski, Lars Kasper, Kilian Weiss and Andreas Sigfridsson. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, NMR in Biomedicine, Radiology and European Heart Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact