Jui‐Fen Lin

588 citations
12 papers · 464 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jui‐Fen Lin

11 papers receiving 457 citations

Peers

Jui‐Fen Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 134
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 45
  • Clinical Biochemistry 28
  • Molecular Biology 252
  • Physiology 92
Replace Aiyun Li with:
Aiyun Li China
Xin Su China
Eleni Tzatzaki Greece
Yasutoshi Ohta Japan
Karthickeyan Chella Krishnan United States
Hanna Myśliwiec Poland
Qingwei Chen China
Yaping Zhu China
Dazhuo Shi China
Jianghong Yan China
Jui‐Fen Lin relative to Aiyun Li China Aiyun Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Aiyun Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jui‐Fen Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jui‐Fen Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jui‐Fen Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jui‐Fen Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jui‐Fen Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jui‐Fen Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jui‐Fen Lin. The network helps show where Jui‐Fen Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jui‐Fen Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jui‐Fen Lin Line = papers co-authored together Jui‐Fen Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2015241
2 201959
3 202047
4 201528
5 202020
6 201319
7 202114
8 200313
9 201711
10 201910
11 20082
12
Retrospectively comparative evaluation of the first- and second-line chemotherapy with campto and oxaliplatin combined with oral tegafur/uracil (UFT)/leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
20100

About Jui‐Fen Lin

Jui‐Fen Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Cell Biology and Physiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (1 paper), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (1 paper), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (1 paper) and Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (134 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (45 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (28 citations), Molecular Biology (252 citations) and Physiology (92 citations). Jui‐Fen Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Mei‐Ling Cheng, Hung‐Yao Ho, Chao‐Hung Wang, Cheng-Yu Huang, Min‐Hui Liu, Yu-Yen Huang, Ming‐Shi Shiao, Chun‐Tai Mao, Ning‐I Yang and Keng‐Shiang Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Cells, Scientific Reports, Food Chemistry, Journal of Biomedical Science and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact