Jue Mo
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
Papers in
-
- Neural dynamics and brain function 5
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 4
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 2
-
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Mingzhou Ding (9 shared papers)Charles E. Schroeder (2 shared papers)Anil Bollimunta (1 shared paper)Haiqing Huang (1 shared paper)Yuelu Liu (1 shared paper)Xiaotong Wen (2 shared papers)Andrew H. Ahn (2 shared papers)Morris Maizels (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Neuroscience (3 papers)NeuroImage (2 papers)European Journal of Wood and Wood Products (1 paper)Pain (1 paper)Biological Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSlovenia
In The Last Decade
Jue Mo
12 papers receiving 682 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Cognitive Neuroscience 541
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 137
- Neurology 30
- Sensory Systems 15
- Psychiatry and Mental health 42
Countries citing papers authored by Jue Mo
This map shows the geographic impact of Jue Mo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jue Mo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jue Mo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jue Mo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jue Mo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jue Mo. The network helps show where Jue Mo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Jue Mo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 343 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 119 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 98 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 0 |
About Jue Mo
Jue Mo is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Building and Construction, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 690 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (3 papers), Forest Management and Policy (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (541 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (137 citations), Neurology (30 citations), Sensory Systems (15 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (42 citations). Jue Mo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Mingzhou Ding, Charles E. Schroeder, Anil Bollimunta, Haiqing Huang, Yuelu Liu, Xiaotong Wen, Andrew H. Ahn, Morris Maizels, Chao Wang and Kenneth M. Heilman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, Pain and Biological Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.