Judith Scheman

926 citations
29 papers · 642 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Judith Scheman

28 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers

Judith Scheman
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 141
  • Pharmacology 299
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 106
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 118
  • Surgery 224
Replace Christine Peeters-Asdourian with:
Christine Peeters-Asdourian United States
Hans‐Raimund Casser Germany
Steven Hanling United States
Hiltrud Liedgens Germany
B. Nagel Germany
R. Edwards United States
Ian Mackey United States
Olga Ivankovich United States
Susanne Lehmann Switzerland
E. Neubauer Germany
Judith Scheman relative to Christine Peeters-Asdourian United States Christine Peeters-Asdourian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Christine Peeters-Asdourian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Judith Scheman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Judith Scheman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Judith Scheman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Judith Scheman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Judith Scheman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Judith Scheman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Judith Scheman. The network helps show where Judith Scheman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Judith Scheman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Judith Scheman Line = papers co-authored together Judith Scheman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200994
2 201689
3 201277
4 201447
5 201245
6 201744
7 201537
8 201329
9 201427
10 201921
11 201418
12 201415
13 200115
14 201514
15 201011
16 201910
17 20188
18 20128
19 20227
20 20137

About Judith Scheman

Judith Scheman is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (20 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (8 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (7 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (7 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (6 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers) and Hernia repair and management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (141 citations), Pharmacology (299 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (106 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (118 citations) and Surgery (224 citations). Judith Scheman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Lisa Ferguson, Sara Davin, Edward C. Covington, Amy B. Sullivan, Manu Mathews, Edward C. Benzel, Sean Mackey, Jennifer L. Murphy, Anna C. Wilson and Robert D. Kerns. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain, Pain Medicine, The American Journal of Surgery, Global Spine Journal and Psychological Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact