Juan E. Campo

429 citations
9 papers · 214 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Juan E. Campo

9 papers receiving 156 citations

Peers

Juan E. Campo
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Geography, Planning and Development 31
  • Anthropology 34
  • Sociology and Political Science 132
  • Religious studies 14
  • Political Science and International Relations 60
Replace Élisabeth Claverie with:
Élisabeth Claverie France
John R. Hinnells United Kingdom
Katharine Hodgkin United Kingdom
Keiji Maegawa
Émile Poulat France
Malory Nye United Kingdom
Gerdien Jonker Germany
Peter France United Kingdom
Vittorio Lanternari Italy
S. Brent Plate United States
Juan E. Campo relative to Élisabeth Claverie France Élisabeth Claverie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Élisabeth Claverie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Juan E. Campo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Juan E. Campo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Juan E. Campo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Juan E. Campo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Juan E. Campo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Juan E. Campo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Juan E. Campo. The network helps show where Juan E. Campo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Juan E. Campo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Juan E. Campo Line = papers co-authored together Juan E. Campo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Encyclopedia of Islam
200972
2 200238
3
The Encyclopedia of Islam
200937
4 199830
5
The Other Sides of Paradise: Explorations into the Religious Meanings of Domestic Space in Islam
199117
6 20158
7 19875
8 19964
9
The Ends of Islamic Fundamentalism: Hegemonic Discourse and the Islamic Question in Egypt
19953

About Juan E. Campo

Juan E. Campo is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Archeology, Education and Philosophy, having authored 9 papers that have together received 214 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (5 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (3 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (3 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (1 paper), Architecture and Cultural Influences (1 paper), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper), Middle East Politics and Society (1 paper) and Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (31 citations), Anthropology (34 citations), Sociology and Political Science (132 citations), Religious studies (14 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (60 citations). Juan E. Campo has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Sharot, Valeska Huber, Eric Tagliacozzo, Gary R. Bunt, Michael Wolfe and Robert R. Bianchi. Their work appears in journals such as The Muslim World, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and eScholarship (California Digital Library).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact