J.Q. Li

471 citations
43 papers · 394 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

J.Q. Li

42 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers

J.Q. Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Condensed Matter Physics 170
  • Structural Biology 13
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 156
  • Materials Chemistry 159
  • Geophysics 33
Replace R. Schneider with:
R. Schneider Germany
M. Motta Brazil
Daniele Cocco Italy
А. П. Орлов Russia
Matthias Hudl Sweden
V. Bekeris Argentina
S. Sarti Italy
P. W. Rooney United States
Xiaoxing Xi United States
J.Q. Li relative to R. Schneider Germany R. Schneider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
R. Schneider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.Q. Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.Q. Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.Q. Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.Q. Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.Q. Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.Q. Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.Q. Li. The network helps show where J.Q. Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.Q. Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.Q. Li Line = papers co-authored together J.Q. Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200541
2 200339
3 200438
4 199328
5 199427
6 200815
7 201315
8 200713
9 200813
10 199213
11 200611
12 201411
13 201811
14 200510
15 20068
16 20088
17 20108
18 20147
19 20057
20 20086

About J.Q. Li

J.Q. Li is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 394 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (13 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (10 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (9 papers), Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices (8 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (6 papers), Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (4 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (4 papers) and Guidance and Control Systems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (170 citations), Structural Biology (13 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (156 citations), Materials Chemistry (159 citations) and Geophysics (33 citations). J.Q. Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Zhongxian Zhao, Huaixin Yang, Ying Shi, Chao Ma, Haifeng Zhang, Dongning Zheng, Hai‐Hu Wen, Jianyong Xiang, Deshun Yin and Shiliang Li. Their work appears in journals such as Solid State Communications, Physica C Superconductivity, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, Ultramicroscopy and IEEE Access.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact