J.P. Scharff

495 citations
35 papers · 445 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

J.P. Scharff

35 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers

J.P. Scharff
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Filtration and Separation 44
  • Ceramics and Composites 51
  • Electrochemistry 18
  • Bioengineering 10
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 85
Replace C.B. Amphlett with:
C.B. Amphlett United Kingdom
Gaston Charlot
R. Paterson United Kingdom
Richard M. Wallace United States
L.A. McDonald United Kingdom
Oksana Ya. Isaikina Russia
Reid A. Peterson United States
Leo K. Yanowski United States
Katsuo Murata Japan
Yoshinori Nishiwaki Japan
J.P. Scharff relative to C.B. Amphlett United Kingdom C.B. Amphlett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.3×
C.B. Amphlett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.P. Scharff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.P. Scharff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.P. Scharff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.P. Scharff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.P. Scharff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.P. Scharff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.P. Scharff. The network helps show where J.P. Scharff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.P. Scharff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.P. Scharff Line = papers co-authored together J.P. Scharff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200533
2 199829
3 200027
4 198526
5 200426
6 200324
7 200624
8 199223
9 198422
10 199420
11 199920
12 200320
13 200520
14 197316
15 197115
16 197512
17 197510
18 197910
19 19798
20 20087

About J.P. Scharff

J.P. Scharff is a scholar working on Filtration and Separation, Ceramics and Composites, Electrochemistry, Organic Chemistry and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 35 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (9 papers), Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (8 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (6 papers), Boron Compounds in Chemistry (5 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (4 papers), Heavy metals in environment (3 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (3 papers) and Humic Substances and Bio-Organic Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Filtration and Separation (44 citations), Ceramics and Composites (51 citations), Electrochemistry (18 citations), Bioengineering (10 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (85 citations). J.P. Scharff has collaborated with scholars based in France, Czechia and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include David Cornu, Philippe Miele, J.P. Deloume, J. Bouix, F. Chassagneux, Isabelle Lamy, C. Vincent, Patrice L. Baldeck, Josef Čáslavský and Jean Marie Létoffé. Their work appears in journals such as Analytica Chimica Acta, Thermochimica Acta, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, Journal of Materials Chemistry and Inorganica Chimica Acta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact