J.P. Doherty
Impact in
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Papers in
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 5
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 3
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 3
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 3
- Ecology 5
- Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 5
- Co-authors
- D.M. Woodcock (10 shared papers)Michael W. Graham (4 shared papers)P.J. Crowther (4 shared papers)Exmond E. Decruz (1 shared paper)Stacie Jefferson (1 shared paper)Steven S. Smith (1 shared paper)Michael Michael (1 shared paper)Mario Noyer-Weidner (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Gene (4 papers)Nucleic Acids Research (2 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (2 papers)Plant Molecular Biology Reporter (1 paper)Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
J.P. Doherty
12 papers receiving 1.0k citations
J.P. Doherty's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Endocrinology 100
- Genetics 343
- Molecular Biology 750
- Molecular Medicine 52
- Biotechnology 53
Countries citing papers authored by J.P. Doherty
This map shows the geographic impact of J.P. Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.P. Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.P. Doherty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J.P. Doherty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.P. Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.P. Doherty. The network helps show where J.P. Doherty may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside J.P. Doherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quantitative evaluation ofEscherichia colihost strains for tolerance to cytosine methylation in plasmid and phage recombinants Hit paper breakdown → | 1989 | 674 |
| 2 | 1997 | 128 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 121 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 37 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 32 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 21 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 2 |
About J.P. Doherty
J.P. Doherty is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Genetics, Plant Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (5 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (5 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (3 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (2 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (100 citations), Genetics (343 citations), Molecular Biology (750 citations), Molecular Medicine (52 citations) and Biotechnology (53 citations). J.P. Doherty has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include D.M. Woodcock, Michael W. Graham, P.J. Crowther, Exmond E. Decruz, Stacie Jefferson, Steven S. Smith, Michael Michael, Mario Noyer-Weidner, Martha E. Linsenmeyer and William Warren. Their work appears in journals such as Gene, Nucleic Acids Research, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Plant Molecular Biology Reporter and Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.