Joya Banerjee

14 papers receiving 574 citations

Peers

Joya Banerjee
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Urology 98
  • Surgery 334
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 55
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 136
  • Rheumatology 91
Replace Marya Plotkin with:
Marya Plotkin United States
Rachel F. Spitzer Canada
Maxim J. McKibben United States
Susan F. Pokorny United States
Divya A. Patel United States
Camila Teixeira Moreira Vasconcelos Brazil
Joseph K. Ruminjo United States
Kelly Curran United States
F.O. Dare Nigeria
Method Kazaura Tanzania
Joya Banerjee relative to Marya Plotkin United States Marya Plotkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.9×
Marya Plotkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joya Banerjee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joya Banerjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joya Banerjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joya Banerjee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joya Banerjee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joya Banerjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joya Banerjee. The network helps show where Joya Banerjee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joya Banerjee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joya Banerjee Line = papers co-authored together Joya Banerjee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2016153
2 201291
3 201873
4 201163
5 201746
6 201944
7 202027
8 201226
9 201318
10 202117
11
Criticisms of African trials fail to withstand scrutiny: male circumcision does prevent HIV infection.
201217
12 202012
13 202110
14 20143
15
Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision (vol 14, 4, 2016)
20160

About Joya Banerjee

Joya Banerjee is a scholar working on Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Rheumatology and Communication, having authored 15 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genital Health and Disease (9 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (5 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (3 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (1 paper), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (1 paper), Urological Disorders and Treatments (1 paper) and Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (98 citations), Surgery (334 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (55 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (136 citations) and Rheumatology (91 citations). Joya Banerjee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brian J. Morris, Jeffrey D. Klausner, Richard G. Wamai, Catherine Hankins, Aaron A.R. Tobian, Myra Betron, Tracy McClair, Sheena Currie, Stefan A. Bailis and Adrian Mindel. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Reproductive Health, Population Health Metrics, Journal of the International AIDS Society and BMC Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact