Joseph Macey

1.6k citations
39 papers · 1.0k · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Joseph Macey

36 papers receiving 974 citations

Peers

Joseph Macey
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Clinical Psychology 404
  • Sociology and Political Science 704
  • Human-Computer Interaction 77
  • Information Systems and Management 91
  • Marketing 98
Replace Jong-Eun Roselyn Lee with:
Jong-Eun Roselyn Lee United States
Arik Cheshin Israel
Jianning Dang China
T. L. Taylor Denmark
Giulia Ranzini Netherlands
Erin E. Hollenbaugh United States
Deniz Mertkan Gezgin Türkiye
Tim Wulf Germany
Sven Joeckel Germany
Caitlin McLaughlin Canada
Joseph Macey relative to Jong-Eun Roselyn Lee United States Jong-Eun Roselyn Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Jong-Eun Roselyn Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Macey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Macey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Macey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Macey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Macey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Macey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Macey. The network helps show where Joseph Macey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Joseph Macey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joseph Macey Line = papers co-authored together Joseph Macey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017154
2 2018149
3 2018129
4 2017129
5 202078
6 201860
7 202050
8 202046
9 202240
10 202037
11 201916
12 201916
13 201813
14 202012
15 202010
16 20239
17 20238
18 20228
19 20187
20
The Games We Play: Relationships between game genre, business model and loot box opening.
20197

About Joseph Macey

Joseph Macey is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (26 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (20 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (8 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (5 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (3 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (3 papers) and Sports Analytics and Performance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (404 citations), Sociology and Political Science (704 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (77 citations), Information Systems and Management (91 citations) and Marketing (98 citations). Joseph Macey has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Juho Hamari, Max Sjöblom, Maria Törhönen, Brett Abarbanel, Mila Bujić, Mikko Salminen, Henri Pirkkalainen, Jani Kinnunen, Martin Adam and Sari Castrén. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, New Media & Society, Internet Research, Eighteenth-Century Fiction and International Gambling Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact