Joon‐Sung Kim

49 papers receiving 902 citations

Peers

Joon‐Sung Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Polymers and Plastics 119
  • Rehabilitation 49
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 20
  • Pharmaceutical Science 37
  • Neurology 72
Replace Daisuke Hirose with:
Daisuke Hirose Japan
Min Kyu Park South Korea
Masashi Shibata Japan
Liwen Li China
Tong Shu China
Yuping Chen China
Yifan Zheng China
Weifeng Jiang China
Zongjian Liu China
Joon‐Sung Kim relative to Daisuke Hirose Japan Daisuke Hirose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Daisuke Hirose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joon‐Sung Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joon‐Sung Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joon‐Sung Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joon‐Sung Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joon‐Sung Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joon‐Sung Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joon‐Sung Kim. The network helps show where Joon‐Sung Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joon‐Sung Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joon‐Sung Kim Line = papers co-authored together Joon‐Sung Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010127
2 201383
3 200360
4 200157
5 201456
6 201351
7 202049
8 201539
9 201034
10 200933
11 201430
12 200126
13 201626
14 201522
15 200521
16 201019
17 201615
18 201814
19 200914
20 201913

About Joon‐Sung Kim

Joon‐Sung Kim is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Surgery, Neurology, Epidemiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 52 papers that have together received 925 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (6 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (5 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (5 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (4 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (4 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (3 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers) and Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (119 citations), Rehabilitation (49 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (20 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (37 citations) and Neurology (72 citations). Joon‐Sung Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Jang‐Joo Kim, Jae‐Wook Kang, Alexandru D. Asandei, Olumide I. Adebolu, Christopher P. Simpson, Seong Mu Jo, Sung‐Yeon Jang, Jeong‐Yi Kwon, Dong Young Kim and Kyungkon Kim. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Advanced Functional Materials, Journal of Industrial Textiles and Journal of Korean Medical Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact