Jonathan Tesch

22 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Jonathan Tesch
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Instrumentation 18
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 94
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 138
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 22
  • Control and Systems Engineering 7
Replace Tim van Werkhoven with:
Tim van Werkhoven Netherlands
Simonetta Chinellato Italy
Edward A. Hileman United States
Darren A. Erickson Canada
Sebastián Zúñiga-Fernández United States
Valeri G. Orlov Mexico
G. Ricort France
Catherine M. Ohara United States
Gaetano Sivo United States
Laura Schreiber Italy
Jonathan Tesch relative to Tim van Werkhoven Netherlands Tim van Werkhoven's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Tim van Werkhoven · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Tesch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Tesch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Tesch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Tesch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Tesch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Tesch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Tesch. The network helps show where Jonathan Tesch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Tesch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Tesch Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Tesch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013141
2 201317
3 202016
4 201213
5 201512
6 202311
7 20137
8 20147
9 20145
10 20184
11 20113
12 20123
13 20133
14 20183
15 20192
16 20192
17 20202
18
High-Performance Control and Prediction for Adaptive Optics
20111
19 20131
20 20181

About Jonathan Tesch

Jonathan Tesch is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Control and Systems Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (22 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (2 papers), Control Systems and Identification (1 paper), Advanced optical system design (1 paper), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (1 paper) and Optical Systems and Laser Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (18 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (94 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (138 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (22 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (7 citations). Jonathan Tesch has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Tuan N. Truong, Rick Burruss, Jennifer E. Roberts, J. C. Shelton, Christoph J. Baranec, David Hale, Jennifer Milburn, Dean L. Palmer, Richard G. Dekany and Thang Q. Trinh. Their work appears in journals such as Optical Engineering, Optics Letters, The Astrophysical Journal, Journal of the Optical Society of America A and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact