Jonathan Sillito

34 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Jonathan Sillito
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Software 359
  • Computer Science Applications 442
  • Information Systems 1.3k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 146
  • Information Systems and Management 108
Replace Andrew Jensen Ko with:
Andrew Jensen Ko United States
Huzefa Kagdi United States
M.-A. Storey Canada
Mircea Filip Lungu Switzerland
Nicholas A. Kraft United States
Joseph Lawrance United States
Collin McMillan United States
Kathryn Thomasset Stolee United States
Ciera Jaspan United States
Vigdis By Kampenes Norway
Jonathan Sillito relative to Andrew Jensen Ko United States Andrew Jensen Ko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Andrew Jensen Ko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Sillito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Sillito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Sillito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Sillito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Sillito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Sillito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Sillito. The network helps show where Jonathan Sillito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Sillito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Sillito Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Sillito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008253
2 2012230
3 2006199
4 2010164
5 2008114
6 200970
7 200963
8 200945
9 201145
10 200943
11 200536
12 201132
13 201130
14 201329
15 201026
16 200425
17 201221
18 200119
19 201216
20 201013

About Jonathan Sillito

Jonathan Sillito is a scholar working on Information Systems, Computer Science Applications, Software, Human-Computer Interaction and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Research (25 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (19 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (13 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (6 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (4 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (4 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers) and Software System Performance and Reliability (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (359 citations), Computer Science Applications (442 citations), Information Systems (1.3k citations), Human-Computer Interaction (146 citations) and Information Systems and Management (108 citations). Jonathan Sillito has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kris De Volder, Gail C. Murphy, Frank Maurer, Thomas Zimmermann, Chris J. Burns, Rahul Premraj, Silvia Breu, David J. Fox, Shaun Phillips and Vahid Garousi. Their work appears in journals such as Empirical Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Lecture notes in computer science, Lecture notes in business information processing and International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact