Jonathan Shaw

27 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Jonathan Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Gender Studies 143
  • Accounting 84
  • Economics and Econometrics 175
  • Demography 55
  • Library and Information Sciences 4
Replace Stephen Whelan with:
Stephen Whelan Australia
Suqin Ge United States
Aico van Vuuren Netherlands
Philipp Doerrenberg Germany
Thor O. Thoresen Norway
Giovanni Gallipoli Canada
M. Dolores Collado Spain
R. Blundell
Graeme Roy United Kingdom
Harold G. Vatter United States
Jonathan Shaw relative to Stephen Whelan Australia Stephen Whelan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Stephen Whelan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Shaw. The network helps show where Jonathan Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Shaw Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016178
2 202131
3 201126
4
A new deal for transport? The UK's struggle with the sustainable transport agenda
200324
5 200611
6 201910
7 202110
8 20157
9 20136
10 20136
11 20176
12 20166
13 20175
14 20203
15 19903
16
Unifying perception and curiosity
20063
17 20133
18
Eradicating child poverty
20072
19
Estimating ethnic parity in Jobcentre Plus programmes: a quantitative analysis using the Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study (WPLS)
20082
20 20072

About Jonathan Shaw

Jonathan Shaw is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Accounting, Gender Studies and Demography, having authored 33 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (5 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (4 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (3 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (2 papers) and Transport and Economic Policies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (143 citations), Accounting (84 citations), Economics and Econometrics (175 citations), Demography (55 citations) and Library and Information Sciences (4 citations). Jonathan Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Costas Meghir, Richard Blundell, Mónica Costa Dias, Iain Docherty, Arun Advani, Peter Levell, Alice Mesnard, Chris Belfield, Barra Roantree and Christopher Rauh. Their work appears in journals such as Econometric Reviews, Fiscal Studies, The Journal of Economic Inequality, Survival and Australian Academic & Research Libraries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact