Jonathan N. Klein

25 papers receiving 459 citations

Peers

Jonathan N. Klein
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 113
  • Instrumentation 269
  • Biophysics 65
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 42
  • Ophthalmology 59
Replace Francesco Tonolini with:
Francesco Tonolini United Kingdom
Haichao Wang China
Timothy W. Fahringer United States
Roger Stettner United States
Carl E. Halford United States
Mark F. Spencer United States
Geoff R. Ayers United Kingdom
V.M. Contarino United States
Diego F. Pierrottet United States
Stephen C. Cain United States
Jonathan N. Klein relative to Francesco Tonolini United Kingdom Francesco Tonolini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×21×
Francesco Tonolini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan N. Klein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan N. Klein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan N. Klein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan N. Klein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan N. Klein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan N. Klein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan N. Klein. The network helps show where Jonathan N. Klein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan N. Klein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan N. Klein Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan N. Klein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016110
2 200954
3 202143
4 201642
5 201540
6 201534
7 200826
8 201617
9 200816
10 201514
11 202312
12 202410
13 200810
14 20169
15
A Quantitative Platform for Non-Line-of-Sight Imaging Problems
20189
16 20197
17 20167
18 20235
19 20174
20 20244

About Jonathan N. Klein

Jonathan N. Klein is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Ophthalmology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 26 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (13 papers), Random lasers and scattering media (7 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (4 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (4 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (4 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (3 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (3 papers) and Ocular and Laser Science Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (113 citations), Instrumentation (269 citations), Biophysics (65 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (42 citations) and Ophthalmology (59 citations). Jonathan N. Klein has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Martin Laurenzis, Matthias B. Hullin, Christoph Peters, Dominik Ludewig Michels, Emmanuel Bacher, Reinhard Klein, Wojtek Pałubicki, Sören Pirk, Bedřich Beneš and Andreas U. Velten. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Graphics, Optics Letters, Scientific Reports, The Astrophysical Journal and Optical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact