Jonathan Mitchell

581 citations
7 papers · 396 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Mitchell

7 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers

Jonathan Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 209
  • Clinical Psychology 171
  • Philosophy 45
  • Social Psychology 67
  • Applied Psychology 11
Replace Charlotte Connor with:
Charlotte Connor United Kingdom
Jessica Pollard United States
Halis Ulaş Türkiye
Sara Kvrgic Switzerland
Daria Brennan Ireland
Michelle Friedman‐Yakoobian United States
Fabienne Wartelsteiner Austria
Astrid Vellinga Netherlands
Joe Oliver United Kingdom
Anna-Sophia Welte Austria
Jonathan Mitchell relative to Charlotte Connor United Kingdom Charlotte Connor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Charlotte Connor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Mitchell. The network helps show where Jonathan Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2010335
2 201020
3 200414
4 201812
5 20177
6 20056
7 20092

About Jonathan Mitchell

Jonathan Mitchell is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Infection Control in Healthcare (1 paper), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (209 citations), Clinical Psychology (171 citations), Philosophy (45 citations), Social Psychology (67 citations) and Applied Psychology (11 citations). Jonathan Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Kuipers, Tim Kendall, Victoria Bird, Preethi Premkumar, Craig Whittington, Gary Latchford, Emma J. Palmer, Rebecca Gossage-Worrall, Daniel Hind and Shanaya Rathod. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, International Journal of Prisoner Health, Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology and BJPsych Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact