Jonathan Lee

1.1k citations
25 papers · 856 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Lee

23 papers receiving 829 citations

Peers

Jonathan Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Oncology 245
  • Biological Psychiatry 18
  • Surgery 231
  • Rheumatology 77
  • Immunology 111
Replace Keming Lin with:
Keming Lin China
Jinbo Huang China
Youngkyun Kim South Korea
Janghee Woo United States
Robin Shaw United Kingdom
Gaku Yamamoto Japan
Christopher C. Gibson United States
Xin Duan China
Yinghui Zhou China
Jonathan Lee relative to Keming Lin China Keming Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Keming Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Lee. The network helps show where Jonathan Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Lee Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008154
2 2004128
3 2005109
4 200989
5 201388
6 200370
7 201541
8 200736
9 201224
10 201819
11 200917
12 201115
13 201613
14 199812
15 20009
16 20138
17 20058
18 20094
19 20054
20 20093

About Jonathan Lee

Jonathan Lee is a scholar working on Surgery, Management Science and Operations Research, Oncology, Artificial Intelligence and Rheumatology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 856 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (3 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (3 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (2 papers), Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions (2 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (2 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (2 papers) and Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (245 citations), Biological Psychiatry (18 citations), Surgery (231 citations), Rheumatology (77 citations) and Immunology (111 citations). Jonathan Lee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Donald L. Morton, Richard Essner, Melvin P. Rosenwasser, Robert J. Strauch, Benton E. Heyworth, Hitoe Torisu‐Itakura, Paul D. Kim, Peter Boatwright, Wagner A. Kamakura and Leslie A. Wanek. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Cancer Research, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, The Journal of Arthroplasty, Fuzzy Sets and Systems and The Journal Of Hand Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact