Jonathan Keep

540 citations
19 papers · 455 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Keep

16 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

Jonathan Keep
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 270
  • Aerospace Engineering 184
  • Materials Chemistry 298
  • Radiation 25
  • Biomedical Engineering 125
Replace Jon Harman with:
Jon Harman United Kingdom
Guoyao Zheng China
J.J. Cordier France
H.J. Ahn South Korea
Chris Harrington United Kingdom
Ahmad M. Ibrahim United States
K. Shibanuma Japan
C. Morlock Germany
Victor Tanchuk Russia
Yuya MIYOSHI Japan
Jonathan Keep relative to Jon Harman United Kingdom Jon Harman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Jon Harman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Keep

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Keep's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Keep with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Keep more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Keep

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Keep. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Keep. The network helps show where Jonathan Keep may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Keep, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Keep Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Keep links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2017162
2 201894
3 201863
4 201735
5 202425
6 201722
7 202418
8 20198
9 20187
10 20197
11 20214
12 20173
13 20212
14 20212
15 20171
16 20241
17 20131
18 20170
19 20260

About Jonathan Keep

Jonathan Keep is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 19 papers that have together received 455 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (12 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (9 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (8 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (5 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (2 papers), Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology (1 paper), Architecture and Computational Design (1 paper) and Advanced Algorithms and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (270 citations), Aerospace Engineering (184 citations), Materials Chemistry (298 citations), Radiation (25 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (125 citations). Jonathan Keep has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Antony Loving, M. Coleman, Neelam Gupta, Francesco Maviglia, Chris Waldon, Thomas F. Franke, F. Cismondi, Christian Bachmann, S. Ciattaglia and Curt Gliss. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Engineering and Design, Journal of Fusion Energy, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Nuclear Fusion and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact