Jonathan Keep
Impact in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
-
- Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
- Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
Papers in
-
- Magnetic confinement fusion research 9
-
- Superconducting Materials and Applications 6
- Co-authors
- A. Loving (7 shared papers)Neelam Gupta (1 shared paper)M. Coleman (4 shared papers)C. Gliss (2 shared papers)F. Moro (1 shared paper)G. Federici (1 shared paper)T. Eade (1 shared paper)U. Fischer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Fusion Engineering and Design (11 papers)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (1 paper)IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (1 paper)Nordic design research conference (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFinlandItaly
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Keep
12 papers receiving 157 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 76
- Aerospace Engineering 79
- Materials Chemistry 105
- Biomedical Engineering 51
- Radiation 10
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Keep
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Keep's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Keep with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Keep more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Keep
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Keep. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Keep. The network helps show where Jonathan Keep may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Keep, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 86 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 0 |
About Jonathan Keep
Jonathan Keep is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Control and Systems Engineering and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 14 papers that have together received 168 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (9 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (6 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (5 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (3 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (2 papers), Architecture and Computational Design (1 paper), Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (1 paper) and Augmented Reality Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (76 citations), Aerospace Engineering (79 citations), Materials Chemistry (105 citations), Biomedical Engineering (51 citations) and Radiation (10 citations). Jonathan Keep has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include A. Loving, Neelam Gupta, M. Coleman, C. Gliss, F. Moro, G. Federici, T. Eade, U. Fischer, S. Ciattaglia and J. Morris. Their work appears in journals such as Fusion Engineering and Design, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science and Nordic design research conference.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.