Jonathan Hogg

22 papers receiving 229 citations

Peers

Jonathan Hogg
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Computational Mathematics 16
  • Hardware and Architecture 95
  • Numerical Analysis 62
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 162
  • Computational Mechanics 52
Replace Moritz Kreutzer with:
Moritz Kreutzer Germany
Mawussi Zounon United Kingdom
Goran Flegar Spain
Violeta Migallón Spain
Andrés E. Tomás Spain
José Penadés Spain
J. K. Reid Australia
Eric F. Van de Velde United States
Tingxing Dong United States
Frédéric Guyomarc'h France
Jonathan Hogg relative to Moritz Kreutzer Germany Moritz Kreutzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Moritz Kreutzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Hogg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Hogg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Hogg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Hogg. The network helps show where Jonathan Hogg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Hogg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Hogg Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Hogg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201047
2 201736
3 201634
4 201320
5 201020
6 201319
7 200914
8 200810
9 20207
10 20136
11 20135
12 20154
13 20183
14 20193
15 20183
16 20093
17 20182
18 20122
19
Batched BLAS (Basic Linear Algebra Subprograms) 2018 Specification
20182
20 20142

About Jonathan Hogg

Jonathan Hogg is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Hardware and Architecture, Numerical Analysis, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 24 papers that have together received 245 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (18 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (9 papers), Numerical Methods and Algorithms (7 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (6 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (3 papers), Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques (3 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (2 papers) and Tensor decomposition and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (16 citations), Hardware and Architecture (95 citations), Numerical Analysis (62 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (162 citations) and Computational Mechanics (52 citations). Jonathan Hogg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include J. A. Scott, John Reid, Evgueni Ovtchinnikov, Iain Duff, Brian Vinter, Ang Li, Andreas Grothey, Kristian Woodsend, Jacek Gondzio and Marco Colombo. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact