Jonathan Dimock

1.8k citations
55 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Dimock

50 papers receiving 961 citations

Peers

Jonathan Dimock
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Mathematical Physics 383
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 495
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 376
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 279
  • Condensed Matter Physics 167
Replace Roland Sénéor with:
Roland Sénéor France
Javier Mas Spain
A. N. Sissakian Russia
Mauricio Porto Pato Brazil
Owe Philipsen Germany
Mike Peardon Ireland
Mark A. Samuel United States
Michał Mazurek Switzerland
Jakub Ryzka Switzerland
J. E. Hetrick United States
Jonathan Dimock relative to Roland Sénéor France Roland Sénéor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Roland Sénéor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Dimock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Dimock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Dimock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Dimock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Dimock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Dimock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Dimock. The network helps show where Jonathan Dimock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Dimock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Dimock Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Dimock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980131
2 201196
3 198274
4 198762
5 197460
6 197644
7 198539
8 199237
9 197432
10 199126
11 198625
12 199524
13 197723
14 200022
15 201121
16 200420
17 199220
18 198619
19 201318
20 199817

About Jonathan Dimock

Jonathan Dimock is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (23 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (15 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (13 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (10 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (10 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (5 papers) and Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (383 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (495 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (376 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (279 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (167 citations). Jonathan Dimock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include T. R. Hurd, Bernard S. Kay, Jean‐Pierre Eckmann, James G. Glimm, David Brydges, S. G. Rajeev, David C. Brydges, Thomas R. Hurd and Cheng Yuan. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, Annales Henri Poincaré, Reviews in Mathematical Physics, Annals of Physics and Journal of Statistical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact