Jonathan Cooper

553 citations
5 papers · 184 · h-index 2

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Cooper

5 papers receiving 176 citations

Peers

Jonathan Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Philosophy 38
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 51
  • Global and Planetary Change 67
  • Social Psychology 47
  • Clinical Psychology 36
Replace M.M. Gholamrezaee with:
M.M. Gholamrezaee Switzerland
Minjie Xu China
Michael Drayton United Kingdom
Marieke J. Schreuder Netherlands
Ryan Hammoud United Kingdom
Pierfrancesco Maria Balducci Italy
Christer Nordlund Sweden
Brian B. Roberts United States
Jeanette Smith United States
Rhodri Hayward United Kingdom
Jonathan Cooper relative to M.M. Gholamrezaee Switzerland M.M. Gholamrezaee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
M.M. Gholamrezaee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Cooper. The network helps show where Jonathan Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Cooper Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 197799
2 201382
3
Defining the prodromal period of psychosis using the Nottingham onset schedule
20041
4 20001
5
The Crown Court Compendium
20191

About Jonathan Cooper

Jonathan Cooper is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 5 papers that have together received 184 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (1 paper), Disaster Management and Resilience (1 paper) and Flood Risk Assessment and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (38 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (51 citations), Global and Planetary Change (67 citations), Social Psychology (47 citations) and Clinical Psychology (36 citations). Jonathan Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Norman Sartorius, Elizabeth Russell, Christian Kuhlicke, Iain White, Annett Steinführer, Eoin O’Neill, Paul M. Thompson, John Minnery, Mark Scott and Andrew Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Planning Theory & Practice and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact