Jonathan Cacace

995 citations
53 papers · 756 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Cacace

50 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers

Jonathan Cacace
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Control and Systems Engineering 371
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 330
  • Aerospace Engineering 300
  • Human-Computer Interaction 49
  • Mechanical Engineering 173
Replace Wim Meeussen with:
Wim Meeussen United States
Nobuto Matsuhira Japan
Matteo Fumagalli Denmark
Jeremy Ma United States
Roland Philippsen Sweden
Kohtaro Ohba Japan
Eitan Marder-Eppstein United States
Flavio Robertí Argentina
Ramón Barber Spain
Carlo Masone Italy
Jonathan Cacace relative to Wim Meeussen United States Wim Meeussen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Wim Meeussen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Cacace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Cacace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Cacace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Cacace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Cacace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Cacace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Cacace. The network helps show where Jonathan Cacace may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Cacace, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Cacace Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Cacace links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015112
2 201480
3 201569
4 201657
5 201552
6 202142
7 202138
8 201430
9 201824
10 202220
11 201419
12 201617
13 201615
14 201514
15 201712
16 202111
17 202111
18 202210
19 202110
20 201910

About Jonathan Cacace

Jonathan Cacace is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Aerospace Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 53 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (16 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (16 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (14 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (10 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers), Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems (6 papers), Soft Robotics and Applications (6 papers) and Robotics and Automated Systems (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Control and Systems Engineering (371 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (330 citations), Aerospace Engineering (300 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (49 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (173 citations). Jonathan Cacace has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Spain and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Vincenzo Lippiello, Alberto Finzi, Fabio Ruggiero, Hamid Sadeghian, Àngel Santamaria‐Navarro, Juan Andrade‐Cetto, M. A. Trujillo, Antidio Viguria, Riccardo Caccavale and Nicola Mimmo. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Drones, Applied Sciences and Robotica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact