Jonathan Bright
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
- Gut microbiota and health
Papers in
-
- Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies 5
-
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 2
- Co-authors
- Eva M. Lenz (5 shared papers)Ian D. Wilson (5 shared papers)Richard Knight (3 shared papers)Hilary Major (3 shared papers)Shethah Morgan (1 shared paper)Anthony Nash (1 shared paper)Henrik Lindberg (1 shared paper)Andrew Hughes (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (3 papers)Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry (1 paper)Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (1 paper)Pharmaceutical Statistics (1 paper)Biomarkers (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Bright
13 papers receiving 895 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Spectroscopy 208
- Molecular Biology 685
- Pharmacology 80
- Clinical Biochemistry 61
- Complementary and alternative medicine 61
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Bright
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Bright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Bright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Bright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Bright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Bright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Bright. The network helps show where Jonathan Bright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Bright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 218 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 208 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 115 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 114 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 111 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 1 |
About Jonathan Bright
Jonathan Bright is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Clinical Biochemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Physiology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 925 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (5 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (1 paper), Vitamin K Research Studies (1 paper) and Muscle metabolism and nutrition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (208 citations), Molecular Biology (685 citations), Pharmacology (80 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (61 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (61 citations). Jonathan Bright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Eva M. Lenz, Ian D. Wilson, Richard Knight, Hilary Major, Shethah Morgan, Anthony Nash, Henrik Lindberg, Andrew Hughes, F. Russell Westwood and D. T. DAVIES. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, Pharmaceutical Statistics and Biomarkers.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.