Jonathan Booth

1.9k citations
47 papers · 1.6k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Booth

47 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jonathan Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Pharmaceutical Science 586
  • Electrochemistry 154
  • Biomaterials 330
  • Materials Chemistry 257
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 41
Replace Victor M.M. Lobo with:
Victor M.M. Lobo Portugal
Sepideh Amjad‐Iranagh Iran
William J. Ward United States
Franciska Sundholm Finland
Wen Bing Yu China
Qun Hui Lu China
Ranjith Krishna Pai India
Chiara Ingrosso Italy
Yanfeng Wang China
Jonathan Booth relative to Victor M.M. Lobo Portugal Victor M.M. Lobo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.4×
Victor M.M. Lobo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Booth. The network helps show where Jonathan Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Booth Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012199
2 1994141
3 2011123
4 200889
5 199773
6 201467
7 201462
8 202161
9 201655
10 201854
11 199551
12 201249
13 199746
14 201145
15 201545
16 199740
17 201640
18 201337
19 199533
20 201631

About Jonathan Booth

Jonathan Booth is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Biomaterials, Electrochemistry, Organic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (20 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (6 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (6 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (6 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (3 papers) and Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (586 citations), Electrochemistry (154 citations), Biomaterials (330 citations), Materials Chemistry (257 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (41 citations). Jonathan Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Richard G. Compton, Giles H.W. Sanders, Mike Claybourn, Elisabeth Vey, Aline F. Miller, Alberto Saiani, E. J. Meehan, J. Burley, Shu Li and Gavin P. Andrews. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Pharmaceutics, Polymer Degradation and Stability, Journal of Controlled Release, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact