Jonathan Bohren

741 citations
8 papers · 524 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Bohren

8 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

Jonathan Bohren
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Control and Systems Engineering 266
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 173
  • Software 30
  • Human-Computer Interaction 32
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 52
Replace Makoto Mizukawa with:
Makoto Mizukawa Japan
Cezary Zieliński Poland
Neil T. Dantam United States
Wim Meeussen United States
Chris Paxton United States
Woo-Keun Yoon Japan
Lorenzo Riano United States
Alberto Finzi Italy
R. Piguet Switzerland
Jeremy A. Marvel United States
Jonathan Bohren relative to Makoto Mizukawa Japan Makoto Mizukawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Makoto Mizukawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Bohren

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Bohren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Bohren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Bohren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Bohren

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Bohren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Bohren. The network helps show where Jonathan Bohren may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Bohren, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Bohren Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Bohren links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2011170
2 2010165
3 2017137
4 201417
5 201614
6 201313
7 20124
8 20114

About Jonathan Bohren

Jonathan Bohren is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Surgery, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 8 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robot Manipulation and Learning (6 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (4 papers), Robotics and Automated Systems (2 papers), Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (2 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (2 papers), Soft Robotics and Applications (1 paper), Space Satellite Systems and Control (1 paper) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Control and Systems Engineering (266 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (173 citations), Software (30 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (32 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (52 citations). Jonathan Bohren has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Steve Cousins, Eitan Marder-Eppstein, Wim Meeussen, Caroline Pantofaru, Radu Bogdan Rusu, Melonee Wise, Stefan M. Holzer, E. Gil Jones, Lorenz Mösenlechner and Sachin Chitta. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, The Journal of Open Source Software and mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact