Jonathan Bach

949 citations
32 papers · 475 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Bach

24 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Jonathan Bach
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Urban Studies 83
  • Political Science and International Relations 233
  • Sociology and Political Science 235
  • Communication 34
  • Business and International Management 9
Replace Anthony W. Pereira with:
Anthony W. Pereira United States
Michael L. Conniff United States
F.J. Schuurman Netherlands
Mark T. Berger Australia
Pablo Policzer Canada
Jan Melissen Netherlands
Richard Ek Sweden
Joseph L. Love United States
Nezar AlSayyad United States
Brantly Womack United States
Jonathan Bach relative to Anthony W. Pereira United States Anthony W. Pereira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Anthony W. Pereira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Bach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Bach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Bach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Bach. The network helps show where Jonathan Bach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Bach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Bach Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Bach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201088
2 201160
3 200255
4 200453
5 201743
6 202026
7 200222
8 201718
9 201117
10 200015
11 200212
12
Between sovereignty and integration: German foreign policy and national identity
199710
13 20159
14 20088
15 20197
16 20156
17 20135
18 20175
19 20214
20
Between sovereignty and integration
19992

About Jonathan Bach

Jonathan Bach is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Social Psychology and Urban Studies, having authored 32 papers that have together received 475 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European history and politics (7 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (5 papers), German History and Society (4 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (4 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (3 papers), China's Global Influence and Migration (3 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers) and Urbanization and City Planning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (83 citations), Political Science and International Relations (233 citations), Sociology and Political Science (235 citations), Communication (34 citations) and Business and International Management (9 citations). Jonathan Bach has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include David Stark, Forest L. Grieves, Peter H. Merkl, M. Murawski, Dietrich Jung and Klaus Schlichte. Their work appears in journals such as German Politics & Society, Theory Culture & Society, German Studies Review, Computer and Memory Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact